Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Critical Care Medicine ; 50:66-66, 2022.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1592658

ABSTRACT

Student scores on the Fundamental Critical Care Support (FCCS) final exam were higher for students using the portable simulation model (n=127), compared to the prior year (n=98) in a standard simulation center (mean 90.8 vs 88.6, p< 0.05). There was no negative impact on final exam scores;student scores actually improved after implementation of the portable simulation model compared to a traditional simulation center. [Extracted from the article] Copyright of Critical Care Medicine is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

2.
Crit Care Explor ; 3(1): e0320, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1033618

ABSTRACT

The presence of spontaneous echo contrast on ultrasonography is a predisposition to increased thromboembolic risk. The purpose of this study was to assess for the prevalence and consequences of spontaneous echo contrast on point-of-care vascular ultrasound in coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN SETTING AND PATIENTS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 39 adult patients admitted to the ICU with a confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 diagnosis at a large tertiary-care academic medical center. Patients were included if they had undergone a vascular ultrasound examination during their ICU admission. Overall, 48 venous ultrasound studies among the 39 patients were reviewed in blinded fashion by two reviewers for the presence of venous spontaneous echo contrast, and charts were analyzed for laboratory data and outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS S: pontaneous echo contrast correlated with serum viscosity (mean values of 2.64, 2.54, and 2.04 cP for dense spontaneous echo contrast, spontaneous echo contrast , and no spontaneous echo contrast, respectively, with a p value of 0.0056 for spontaneous echo contrast compared with negative spontaneous echo contrast) and hyperfibrinogenemia (mean values of 726.6, 668.5, and 566.6 mg/dL for dense spontaneous echo contrast, positive spontaneous echo contrast, and negative spontaneous echo contrast, respectively, with a p value of 0.0045 for dense spontaneous echo contrast compared with negative spontaneous echo contrast). About 36% of patients with dense spontaneous echo contrast and 33% of individuals with positive spontaneous echo contrast experienced significant clotting events compared with 17% of those with negative spontaneous echo contrast. A total of 19% of patients with spontaneous echo contrast suffered a cardiac arrest following a major clotting event, and there were no cardiac arrests from clotting events in the negative spontaneous echo contrast group. There was no association with the presence of spontaneous echo contrast and right or left cardiac function or other laboratory values such as d-dimer, external thromboelastometry - maximum lysis, platelet counts, C-reactive protein, or interleukin-6. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care venous ultrasonography is easily performed and reliably interpreted for visualization of spontaneous echo contrast. The presence of spontaneous echo contrast in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with hyperviscosity and increased rates of thrombotic events and complications.

3.
Crit Care Explor ; 2(12): e0288, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-966123

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with high mortality rates and multiple organ damage. There is increasing evidence that these patients are at risk for various cardiovascular insults; however, there are currently no guidelines for the diagnosis and management of such cardiovascular complications in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. We share data and recommendations from a multidisciplinary team to highlight our institution's clinical experiences and guidelines for managing cardiovascular complications of coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN SETTING AND PATIENTS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to one of six ICUs dedicated to the care of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 located in three hospitals within one academic medical center in Atlanta, Georgia. MEASUREMENTS/INTERVENTIONS: Chart review was conducted for sociodemographic, laboratory, and clinical data. Rates of specific cardiovascular complications were assessed, and data were analyzed using a chi-square or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for categorical and continuous variables. Additionally, certain cases are presented to demonstrate the sub committee's recommendations. MAIN RESULTS: Two-hundred eighty-eight patients were admitted to the ICU with coronavirus disease 2019. Of these, 86 died (29.9%), 242 (84.03%) had troponin elevation, 70 (24.31%) had dysrhythmias, four (1.39%) had ST-elevation myocardial infarction, eight (2.78%) developed cor pulmonale, and 190 (65.97%) with shock. There was increased mortality risk in patients with greater degrees of troponin elevation (p < 0.001) and with the development of arrhythmias (p < 0.001), cor pulmonale (p < 0.001), and shock (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While there are guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pulmonary complications of coronavirus disease 2019, there needs to be more information regarding the management of cardiovascular complications as well. These recommendations garnered from the coronavirus disease 2019 cardiology subcommittee from our institution will add to the existing knowledge of these potential cardiovascular insults as well as highlight suggestions for the diagnosis and management of the range of cardiovascular complications of coronavirus disease 2019. Additionally, with the spread of coronavirus disease 2019, our case-based recommendations provide a bedside resource for providers newly caring for patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

4.
New Zealand Medical Journal (Online) ; 133(1513):97, 2020.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-824110

ABSTRACT

Childhood obesity is common in New Zealand with one in three 4-5 year-old children identified as overweight or obese in the before school check (B4SC) programme. Recently, the use of BMI for assessing childhood obesity in the B4SC programme has been questioned. This article provides evidence in support of the assessment of BMI during the B4SC, including specific key points: * BMI is currently the only appropriate field tool for assessing overweight and obesity. * Our New Zealand data show that BMI is reliable at measuring adiposity in all ethnic groups. * High childhood BMI often leads to adult obesity and is associated with increased adult morbidity and mortality. * We believe parents do want to know information regarding their child's obesity risk, based on recent findings in our New Zealand study.

5.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 77(23): 1961-1964, 2020 11 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-706948

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Successful use of alteplase and argatroban to treat a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated massive pulmonary embolism with cardiac arrest is reported. SUMMARY: This case report describes a 42-year-old male with COVID-19 who developed a massive pulmonary embolism resulting in cardiac arrest after suspected failure of low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for a deep venous thrombosis. Administration of two 50-mg doses of intravenous alteplase resulted in return of spontaneous circulation, and low-dose argatroban was used as follow-up anticoagulation therapy without complications. This is the first case report of use of argatroban in a patient with COVID-19 with cardiac arrest-associated massive pulmonary embolism after failure of previous anticoagulation efforts. CONCLUSION: Argatroban may be used as an alternate anticoagulation strategy in COVID-19 patients who fail low-molecular weight therapy. A risk versus benefit discussion should be had regarding appropriateness of therapy as well as dosing. More data is needed to understand the unique hypercoagulable condition in COVID-19 patients as well as research that further highlights the role of argatroban and bivalirudin therapy in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Pipecolic Acids/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Adult , Arginine/analogs & derivatives , COVID-19 , Heart Arrest/etiology , Heart Arrest/therapy , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Sulfonamides , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL